Some Remarks on A. Tamminga’s Paper “Correspondence Analysis for Strong Three-valued Logic”

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: 05.10.2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2017-23-2-96-97

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

V. I. Shalack

Abstract

In this note we present two remarks to the A. Tamminga’s paper. The first remark relates to incorrect Definition 1, and the second remark relates to the main theorem of the paper. We propose the necessary corrections.
DOI: 10.21146/2074-1472-2017-23-2-96-97

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Shalack V. I. Some Remarks on A. Tamminga’s Paper “Correspondence Analysis for Strong Three-valued Logic” // Logicheskie Issledovaniya / Logical Investigations. 2017. VOL. 23. № 2. C. 96-97.
Issue
Vol 23 No 2 (2017)
Section
Papers

References

Tamminga, A. “Correspondence Analysis for Strong Three-valued Logic”, Logical investigations, 2014, Vol. 20, pp. 255–268.