Abstract Logics as classifications of abstract structures
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract logics are developed within a structuralist approach to the subject and disciplinary boundaries of logic. Nevertheless, within algebraic, proof-theoretic, and model-theoretic traditions, diverse interpretations of abstract logics are possible. Focusing on the model-theoretic tradition, this paper presents an alternative viewpoint that challenges the standard conception of abstract logics as structures. Instead, it argues for interpreting abstract logics as classifications of abstract structures (i.e., isomorphism types). From this perspective, the property of invariance under isomorphism ceases to function as a traditional criterion for distinguishing logical from non-logical terms—a criterion that has faced legitimate criticism in contemporary philosophy of logic. Invariance is rather treated as meta-constraints imposed on classes of structures, rendering it impossible to distinguish among structures belonging to the same isomorphism type using the tools of abstract model theory. The variability of such meta-constraints in early and modern model theories is examined. Two distinct ontological perspectives are compared: one perspective regards an abstract structure as a form that is common to all members of an isomorphism type, while the other perspective sees it as the isomorphism type itself, which can be represented by any of its tokens. The roles played by Edmund Husserl’s concept of definite manifold and Rudolf Carnap’s notion of model structure in shaping the metatheoretical apparatus of model theory are elucidated. Supporting evidence for interpreting definitive manifolds as isomorphism types is presented, alongside counterarguments highlighting specific shortcomings. Furthermore, the paper investigates a trichotomy within early model theory involving monomorphicity, deductive completeness, and non-forkability. Finally, prospects for advancing the proposed interpretation of abstract logics are explored, motivated by the diversity of criteria for structural similarity currently employed in model-theoretic research.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2025 Елена Григорьевна Драгалина-Черная

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Драгалина-Черная, 2024 – Драгалина-Черная Е.Г. Варианты инвариантности в формальных и региональных онтологиях // HORIZON. Феноменологические исследования. 2024. Том 13. № 1. С. 15–32.
Карпенко, 2004 – Карпенко А.С. Предмет логики в свете основных тенденций ее развития // Логические исследования / Logical Investigations. 2004. Т. 11. C. 149–171.
Рассел, 2007 – Рассел Б. Введение в математическую философию. Избранные работы. Новосибирск: Изд-во Сиб. ун-та, 2007, 272 с.
Хинтикка, 2014 – Хинтикка Я. О Геделе. М.: Канон, 2014, 256 с.
Aranda, 2022 – Aranda V. Completeness: From Husserl to Carnap // Logica Universalis. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 1-2. P. 57-83.
Awodey, Carus, 2001 – Awodey S., Carus A. W. Carnap, Completeness, and Categoricity: The “Gabelbarkeitssatz” of 1928 // Erkenntnis. 2001. Vol. 54. No. 2. P. 145-172.
Awodey, Reck, 2002 – Awodey S., Reck E. Completeness and Categoricity. Part 1: Nineteenth-Century Axiomatics to Twentieth-Century Metalogic // Hist. Philos. Logic. 2002. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 1–30.
Awodey, 2007 – Awodey S. Carnap’s Quest for Analyticity: The Studies in Semantics// The Cambridge Companion to Carnap / Ed. by M. Friedman and R. Creath. Cambridge University Press. 2007. P. 226 – 247.
Baldwin, 2018 – Baldwin J. Model Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Formalization without Foundationalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2018. 362 p.
Banick, 2020 – Banick K. Husserl, Model Theory, and Formal Essences // Husserl Studies. 2020. Vol. 37, No. 2. P. 103-125.
Barwise, 1985 – Barwise J. Model-Theoretic Logics: Background and Aims // Modeltheoretic logics / Ed. by J. Barwise and S. Feferman. Springer-Verlag, New York. 1985. P. 3-23.
Barwise, Seligman, 1997 – Barwise J., Seligman J. Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. 274 p.
Béziau, 2020 – Béziau J.-Y. Logical Structures from a Model-Theoretical Viewpoint // Abstract Consequence and Logics: Essays in Honor of Edelcio G. de Souza / Ed. by A. Costa-Leite. College Publications. 2020. P. 21-34.
Bonnay, 2008 – Bonnay D. Logicality and Invariance // Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. 2008, Vol.14. P. 29–68.
Carnap, 1928 – Carnap R. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Weltkreis, Berlin. 1928. 109 p.
Carnielli, Coniglio, D’Ottaviano, 2009 – Carnielli W.A., Coniglio M.E., D’Ottaviano I.M.L. New Dimensions on Translations Between Logics // Logica Universalis. 2009. Vol. 3. P. 1-18.
Carus, 2016 – Carus A.W. Carnap and Phenomenology: What Happened in 1924 //Influences on the Aufbau // Ed. by C. Damböck. Cham. 2016. P. 137- 162.
Centrone, 2010 – Centrone S. Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl. Springer, Dordrecht. 2010. 232 p.
Da Silva, 2016 – Da Silva J. Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness, Still // Synthese. 2016. Vol. 193. P. 1925-1947.
Dragalina-Chernaya, 2024 – Dragalina-Chernaya E. Logical Hylomorphism Revisited: Aristotle, Tarski, and Corcoran // Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth. Studies in Universal Logic / Ed. by T.L. Madigan and J.-Y. Béziau. Birkhäuser, Cham. 2024. P. 109–118.
Dummett, 1991 – Dummett M. Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 1991. 331 p.
Feferman, 1999 – Feferman S. Logic, Logics, and Logicism // Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 1999. Vol. 40. P. 31–54.
Font, Jansana, Pigozzi, 2003 – Font J.M., R. Jansana R., Pigozzi D. A Survey of Abstract Algebraic Logic // Studia Logica. 2003. Vol. 74. No. 12 . P. 13-97.
Frege, 1980 – Frege G. Gottlob Frege: Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence / Ed. by G. Gabriel at al. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 214 p.
Frigg, 2022 – Frigg R. Models and Theories. A Philosophical Inquiry. Routledge. 2022. 495 p.
Garcia-Matos, Väänänen, 2005 – Garcia-Matos M., Väänänen J. Abstract Model Theory as a Framework for Universal Logic // Logica Universalis: Towards a General Theory of Logic / Ed. by J.Y. Beziau. Birkh¨auser, Basel. 2005. P. 19-33.
Hartimo, 2017 – Hartimo M. Husserl and Hilbert // Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics / Ed. by S. Centrone. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. 2017. P. 245 – 262.
Hartimo, 2018 – Hartimo M. Husserl on Completeness, Definitely // Synthese. 2018. Vol. 195, P. 1509-1527.
Hartimo, 2020 – Hartimo M. Husserl on “Besinnung” and Formal Ontology // Metametaphysics and the Sciences: Historical and Philosophical perspectives / Ed. by F. Kjosavik and C. Serck-Hanssen. Routledge, New York. 2020. P. 200–215.
Hill, 2002 – Hill O. Tackling Three of Frege’s Problems: Edmund Husserl on Sets and Manifolds // Axiomathes. 2002. Vol. 13. P. 79–104.
Hintikka, 1988 – Hintikka J. On the Development of the Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory // Synthese. 1988. Vol. 77. P. 1–36.
Husserl, 1969 – Husserl E. Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1969. 340 p.Husserl, 2003 – Husserl E. Philosophy of Arithmetic: Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887–1901. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003. 579 p.
Husserl, 2008 – Husserl E. Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge: Lecture 1906/07 (Hua XIII). Springer, Dordrecht. 2008. 508 p.
Hodges, 1986 – Hodges W. Truth in a Structure // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1986. Vol. 86. P. 135 – 151.
Hodges, 1997 – Hodges W. A Shorter Model Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997. 324 p.
Kennedy, Väänänen, 2021 – Kennedy J., Väänänen J. Logicality and Model Classes // Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. 2021, Vol. 27. No. 4. P. 385-414.
Mancosu, 2010 – Mancosu P. The Adventure of Reason. Interplay between Mathematical Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics: 1900–1940. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2010. 618 p.
Manzano, Alonso, 2013 – Manzano M., Alonso E. Completeness: from G¨odel to Henkin // History and Philosophy of Logic, 2013. Vol. 35, No.1. P. 50–75.
Null, Simons, 1982 – Null G., Simons R. Manifolds, Concepts and Moment Abstracta // Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology / Ed. by B. Smith. München. 1982. P. 439-480.
Parrochia, Neuville, 2013 – Parrochia D., Neuville P. Towards a General Theory of Classifications. Springer, Basel. 2013. 304 p.
Poincaré, 1963 – Poincaré H. Mathematics and Science: Last Essays. Dover Publications, 128 p.
Redhead, 2001 – Redhead M. The Intelligibility of the Universe // Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 2001. Vol. 48. P. 73-90.
Rosado Haddock, 2008 – Rosado Haddock G. The Young Carnap’s Unknown Master: Husserl’s Influence on Der Raum and Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2008. 150 p.
Roy, 2004 – Roy J.-M. Carnap’s Husserlian Reading of the Aufbau // Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena / Ed. by S. Awodey, C. Klein. Open Court, Chicago. 2004. P. 41–62.
Sagi, 2022 – Sagi G. Invariance Criteria as Meta-Constraints // Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 104–132.
Schiemer, Zach, Reck, 2017 – Schiemer G., Zach R., Reck E. Carnap’s Early Metatheory: Scope and Limits // Synthese. 2017. Vol. 194. No. 1. P. 33–65.
Schiemer, 2020 – Schiemer G. Carnap’s Structuralist Thesis // The Prehistory of Mathematical Structuralism / Ed. by E. H. Reck and G. Schiemer. Oxford University Press. 2020. P. 383-420.
Smith, 2002 – Smith D. Mathematical Form in the World // Philosophia Mathematica. 2002. Vol. 10, No. 2. P. 102-129.
Tarski, 1956 – Tarski A. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938 / Ed. by J. Corcoran. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 536 p.Tarski, Vaught, 1957 – Tarski A., Vaught R. L. Arithmetical extensions of relational systems // Compositio Mathematica. 1957. Vol. 13. P. 81–102.
Van Benthem, Bonnay, 2008 – Van Benthem J., Bonnay D. Modal Logic and Invariance // Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics. 2008. Vol. 18. No. 2-3. P. 153-173.
Van Benthem, 2021 – Van Benthem J. Semantic Perspectives in Logic // The Semantic Conception of Logic: Essays on Consequence, Invariance, and Meaning / Ed. by G. Sagi and J. Woods. Cambridge University Press, New York. 2021. P. 117-141.